|
NASA officials pronounced President Clinton's 1998 budget proposal for NASA as "stable" even though the agency's budget was cut by more than $200 million from 1997.
"The President put into place stable funding for the next five years," NASA Administrator Dan Goldin said at a press conference February 6. "This stable funding shows the commitment this Administration has to science and technology."
Under the President's proposal, NASA would receive $13.5 billion in fiscal year 1998, down from $13.7 billion in 1997 and $13.9 billion in 1996.
Although the agency's budget was cut by $200 million, few programs were shortchanged in the budget. $100 million in savings came from payments to the Russian Space Agency made in 1997 that were not repeated in 1998, while cost savings in the shuttle program accounted for more than $100 million.
The cost savings allows NASA to increase -- slightly -- the budget for space science and technology programs. The space science budget increased by $75 million in the 1998 proposal to just over $2 billion.
The space science budget includes the first $81 million in funding for the Space Infrared Telescope Facility (SIRTF), the last of the four "Great Observatories" in orbit and a target of budget cuts in recent years.
More space science funding was also allocated to small spacecraft programs, including the Discovery and New Millennium projects. The Mars Surveyor program also received addition funding to speed its efforts to launch a sample return mission by 2005.
Much of the increased space science research is tied to NASA's "Origins" program to understand the creation of the universe, the solar system, and life on Earth and possibly other worlds.
Aeronautics and space transportation technology got a $130 million boost in the 1998 budget proposal. This includes a $70 million increase in funds for reusable launch vehicle research. Aeronautics research absorbed the rest of the additional money.
Space station funding remained constant at $2.1 billion in fiscal year 1998, but with a funding shift beginning from the development of the station to operation of the station during construction.
Projections for NASA's budget in future years showed funding slipping to $13.4 billion in 1999 and $13.2 billion in 2000, then holding steady through 2002. Under the same budget plan, the federal budget deficit is slated to disappear by the year 2002.
Not everyone was happy with the budget. The National Space Society released a statement that criticized the Clinton administrator for cutting NASA's budget despite the strong recent performance of the agency.
Noting that in 1998 dollars the proposed budget amounts to a $500 million cut from the 1997 budget, NSS Executive Director David Brandt said, "For doing their job, NASA's proposed budget for 1998 is being slashed by another $500 million. NASA and Administrator Goldin are obligated to be 'pleased' with the President's proposal, but we're not."
"More than ever, it's crucial for the U.S. to invest in science and engineering," Brandt added. "That means supporting NASA, which generates advanced technologies for the future."
The budget is now subject to Congressional scrutiny, and is likely subject to at least minor changes before it is approved by Congress.
"We know NASA will continue to create missions that shape the future," Goldin said, "and discoveries that rewrite the history books."
|